Harrison’s buying is spread across multiple managers. Antonio Williams’ buying is heavily concentrated in one manager. Shough’s selling includes substantial returns. Those distinctions matter more than the leaderboard alone.
Below, every example lists what the tracked sharp manager received and gave up. SF means superflex; TEP means the site’s listed tight-end reception bonus. Pick positions are omitted because the latest feed displayed rounds without early/mid/late labels.
TOP 10 BUYS: WHAT MANAGERS ACTUALLY PAID
1. Marvin Harrison Jr. — 13 buys, 3 sells, net +10
Acquisitions included Harrison for a 2027 second and third, Harrison for Deebo Samuel plus a 2027 second, and Harrison for Mike Evans plus Kenny Gainwell. These were 12-team SF deals.
The 13 buys came from 10 distinct sharp IDs, making this broader participation than the Bell or Williams buying. Prices varied considerably: another buyer surrendered Brian Thomas plus a second. Interpretation: investigate discounted opportunities, but the feed does not support treating every Harrison asking price as a bargain. Trades
2. Chris Bell — 11 buys, 2 sells, net +9
Standalone acquisitions included Bell for a 2027 early third, a 2027 late second, and Pat Bryant plus a 2027 mid second.
However, Sharp #692 supplied five of the 11 buys, including several more expensive purchases. There is interest beyond that manager, but nearly half the buying reflects one person’s repeated conviction. Interpretation: the cheaper transactions are useful negotiation references; the leaderboard does not establish consensus around the higher prices. Trades
3. Kyle Pitts — 9 buys, 0 sells, net +9
One manager received Pitts plus a 2027 fourth for Jaylen Waddle and Woody Marks in 12-team SF with 1 TEP. Another acquired Pitts for Travis Kelce, Cooper Rush and a 2027 second in 12-team, half-PPR, 1QB.
Nine different sharp IDs bought him, but many deals included multiple major assets. Interpretation: broad buying interest, with meaningful prices paid. Tight-end premium and package construction prevent calling this a uniform buy-low market. Trades
4. D’Andre Swift — 14 buys, 6 sells, net +8
Buyers paid Terry McLaurin straight up, or Jacory Croskey-Merritt plus a 2028 second, in 12-team SF. Another received Swift and Mike Evans for a 2027 first.
A seller received Bhayshul Tuten plus a 2027 second for Swift. Interpretation: active two-way trading, with opportunities to acquire multiple usable players in one deal or turn Swift into a younger asset plus a pick. Team needs and price matter more than the positive net alone. Trades
5. Dallas Goedert — 11 buys, 3 sells, net +8
Buyers surrendered Davante Adams, Michael Pittman, or Josh Downs plus a 2027 third. Those deals carried 0.75–1 TEP.
Conversely, a seller accepted 2027 and 2028 thirds in 0.5 TEP. Interpretation: scoring-sensitive demand and a wide price range. A modest pick cost and an established receiver cost are very different propositions. Trades
6. Saquon Barkley — 8 buys, 0 sells, net +8
Standalone purchases included a 2027 first, a 2028 first plus third, and Javonte Williams plus a 2027 fourth. Another buyer received Barkley plus a fifth for Swift and Juwan Johnson. All were 12-team SF.
Interpretation: these deals show concrete ways to acquire Barkley through picks or player swaps. The first-round examples provide cleaner price references than the larger packages, although future pick quality remains unknown. Trades
7. Antonio Williams — 10 buys, 4 sells, net +6
Sharp #045 accounted for eight of the 10 buys. That manager repeatedly paid a 2028 first, and in another league paid a 2028 first plus third.
One transaction involved a sharp on each side: Williams went to #045, while #042 received Wan’Dale Robinson and Oronde Gadsden. Consequently, the feed showed 13 distinct trades but 14 buy/sell observations.
Interpretation: this is primarily one manager accumulating Williams across leagues. It should not be presented as 10 independent endorsements or broad agreement that he is worth a first. Trades
8. George Pickens — 9 buys, 3 sells, net +6
Buyers paid Drake London straight up in 10-team SF, or Brian Thomas and Matthew Golden in 12-team SF.
A seller combined Pickens and Swift to acquire Ja’Marr Chase. Another received TreVeyon Henderson plus a 2027 first for Pickens and a fourth.
Interpretation: managers are both paying substantial acquisition costs and using Pickens to move into another major asset. Positive buying does not make him an automatic hold at every offered return. Trades
9. Colston Loveland — 8 buys, 2 sells, net +6
One buyer paid Isaiah Likely and Chris Rodriguez. Another received Loveland plus a 2027 first for Brock Bowers in 12-team SF with 1 TEP.
Yet a separate 10-team, 1-TEP transaction went the opposite way on compensation: the buyer surrendered Bowers plus a 2027 second for Loveland alone.
Interpretation: the prices are too dispersed to infer a dependable Bowers–Loveland exchange rate. The useful takeaway is to explore offers in your league, not copy an extreme transaction. Trades
10. Puka Nacua — 6 buys, 0 sells, net +6
One manager acquired Nacua for a 2027 first and second in 12-team SF. Another received Nacua, two 2027 seconds and a third for Nico Collins and Drake London.
Interpretation: the pick-only deal offers a simple acquisition reference; the second is a restructuring of valuable assets with substantial compensation attached. Neither establishes a universal Nacua price. Trades
TOP 10 SELLS: WHAT MANAGERS RECEIVED
1. Pat Bryant — 0 buys, 11 sells, net −11
Straight exits returned a 2027 third, a 2027 fourth, or Jonah Coleman. Other managers packaged Bryant with a third for David Montgomery, or with Stribling for Terry McLaurin and Jakobi Meyers.
Interpretation: the feed contains both low-price exits and attempts to upgrade through packages. This is stronger evidence of managers reducing exposure than a list composed entirely of large trades. Trades
2. De’Zhaun Stribling — 4 buys, 13 sells, net −9
Sales included Stribling for a 2027 second, and Stribling for J.K. Dobbins plus Michael Pittman. Another manager added a second to acquire Christian Watson.
Interpretation: several sellers obtained meaningful players or draft capital. The activity supports exploring those returns, rather than assuming Stribling should be moved cheaply. Trades
3. Kirk Cousins — 2 buys, 10 sells, net −8
Multiple standalone sales returned a 2027 third in SF. One 14-team SF seller received a 2027 second plus a 2028 fourth. A buyer also acquired Cousins for a third.
Interpretation: third-round transactions provide a recurring price reference on both sides. Whether that exit makes sense depends heavily on your need for quarterback depth. Trades
4. Tyler Shough — 1 buy, 9 sells, net −8
One seller received Kyler Murray, a 2027 first, and 2027 and 2028 seconds for Shough alone in 12-team SF. Another received Omarion Hampton plus a second in 14-team SF. Shough plus Jonathon Brooks returned Trevor Lawrence.
Interpretation: these are substantial returns or quarterback upgrades. Calling this simply “managers losing confidence” would miss the central fact: some sellers were paid considerably to move him. Trades
5. Jacoby Brissett — 6 buys, 13 sells, net −7
Several SF sales returned a 2027 third; other standalone returns included Jayden Reed or Chris Godwin. A buyer paid a 2027 second plus a 2028 fourth.
Interpretation: the market is divided, with noticeably different prices available. The feed’s repeated third-round exits should be weighed against the value of keeping quarterback coverage. Trades
6. Rome Odunze — 1 buy, 8 sells, net −7
Standalone sales returned DeVonta Smith, or Matthew Golden plus a 2027 second, in 12-team SF. Odunze plus Quentin Johnston also returned Harrison.
Interpretation: managers are choosing alternative receivers and packages, rather than uniformly exchanging Odunze for low-value picks. These player-to-player comparisons are the useful context. Trades
7. David Montgomery — 4 buys, 10 sells, net −6
Standalone sales returned a 2027 first in one league and a 2027 second in another. A buyer acquired him for Bryant plus a third.
Interpretation: the same player can be an attractive purchase at one price and an attractive sale at another. Montgomery’s feed demonstrates why net selling alone is insufficient advice. Trades
8. Cam Ward — 2 buys, 8 sells, net −6
Sharp #272 exchanged Ward for Sam Darnold in two leagues. Another seller packaged Ward, Omarion Hampton and Mike Gesicki for Drake Maye plus four later-round picks.
Interpretation: part of the negative flow reflects repeated quarterback preference from one manager; another part reflects packaging Ward into an upgrade. Large and multi-team deals do not isolate Ward’s individual value. Trades
9. Ted Hurst — 1 buy, 7 sells, net −6
The clearest standalone exit was Hurst for Stefon Diggs. Most remaining sales involved packages, including the acquisitions of Nacua or Pitts, Romeo Doubs and Chris Olave.
Interpretation: Hurst is frequently an outgoing piece in larger transactions. Those trades offer weaker evidence about his standalone value or a specific negative view of him. Trades
10. Bryce Young — 0 buys, 6 sells, net −6
One seller received Jameson Williams straight up in 14-team SF. Another surrendered Young plus a 2027 third for a 2027 second in 12-team SF.
Interpretation: unlike a feed consisting only of blockbuster packages, these examples include a direct player pivot and a modest pick upgrade. They support a more cautious reading of demand, while still requiring league-specific judgment. Trades
HOW THE TRADE CONTEXT CHANGES THE REPORT
The strongest distinctions are breadth of participation, price paid, and the role of the player in the package. Harrison and Pitts attracted multiple independent buyers. Williams’ buying was dominated by one manager. Shough sellers sometimes received substantial compensation. Hurst was usually one component of a larger deal.
These are completed trades from the tracker’s selected managers—not verified fair values or proof of their motivations. The seven-day window is rolling, and the same transaction can appear under several players. Buy/sell totals therefore should not be added together as independent market-wide evidence.
Data provided by PlayForKeeps.com